Hayley Paige just isn’t permitted to announce a new model identify until finally 2022 just after being held in contempt of courtroom

  • In May, Hayley Paige Gutman introduced she planned to start a new bridal manufacturer in 2022.
  • JLM submitted a motion of contempt after Gutman made her announcement.
  • On Wednesday, a court docket granted the movement, protecting against Gutman from talking about the model until finally 2022.

Hayley Paige Gutman is not going to be capable to announce the identify of her new bridal model at any time before long mainly because she was held in civil contempt of courtroom on Wednesday.

As Insider has documented, Gutman is in the midst of a lawful struggle with JLM Couture around the social-media accounts linked with the model and the trademark for the name Hayley Paige.

JLM was granted a preliminary injunction against Gutman in March, stopping her from employing any @misshayleypaige social-media accounts or Hayley Paige emblems.

On June 2, the court docket clarified that Gutman could launch a brand underneath a new name in August 2022, when the injunction is set to expire. Foreseeable future litigation could adjust the timing.

Just after the June 2 ruling, Gutman declared her plans to start a brand on the @allthatglittersonthegram Instagram account. At the time, she completely told Insider: “I am psyched that my reentry is so shortly and that I have a calendar year to produce brand new thoughts.”

She later on shared the Insider report to her Instagram story. She blocked out “Hayley Paige” from the headline, but her followers could swipe up to go through the tale, which integrated her title.

Gutman shared Insider’s story on the @allthatglittersonthegram Instagram account.


As a result of her write-up and responses to Insider, JLM submitted a movement of contempt versus Gutman on July 15. In the movement, reviewed by Insider, JLM argued that Gutman violated the phrases of their non-contend settlement simply because her posts and statements are assisting her construct a new aid foundation.

The movement also listed the simple fact that Gutman shared Insider’s tale on Instagram alongside with posts she manufactured of herself sketching attire, which JLM said it works by using as a promoting device.

The business filed the movement after sending Gutman a letter requesting she get rid of posts from her Instagram and challenge a retraction to Insider. Gutman denied the ask for, sharing a screenshot of the letter to Instagram on June 25.

On Wednesday, a choose partly granted JLM’s request to maintain Gutman in contempt.

In a memorandum considered by Insider, the court mentioned Gutman was advertising and marketing her forthcoming model – which would contend with JLM – with her posts and comments to Insider, placing her in willful, civil contempt of the injunction.

The court docket made the decision Gutman is enjoined from “asserting a new brand name name in the context of a current or long run professional undertaking involving” bridal use, equipment, night wear, or any other items marketed by JLM until finally the injunction expires.

Hayley Paige isn't allowed to announce a new brand name until 2022 after being held in contempt of court
Gutman was uncovered to be in willful contempt of courtroom.


In accordance to the memorandum, Gutman will have to pay out JLM’s “sensible attorneys’ charges and expenditures” simply because she violated the terms of the injunction. The exact overall had nonetheless to be made the decision.

She will have to also delete Instagram posts associated to her strategies for a new model from May possibly 7, June 7, June 21, June 25, and July 15, 2021, within 5 times of the ruling, as stated in the memorandum, which states she will be fined $5,000 for just about every day she is not compliant.

Gutman shared the information with an Instagram article on Thursday. She experienced not deleted each individual write-up essential at the time of composing, nevertheless some of the posts appear to have been deleted from her account.

In a press release from Thursday, a JLM spokesperson stated: “JLM is pleased with the result of this final decision, even though it is unfortunate that it has appear to this. The Courtroom issued a distinct PI primarily based upon the legal rights and provisions that Ms. Gutman voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently agreed to, which Ms. Gutman has flagrantly violated.”

“JLM continuously tried using to attain Ms. Gutman’s compliance in advance of producing this movement, but Ms. Gutman refused,” the spokesperson went on to say. “It is JLM’s hope that Ms. Gutman will respect her contractual obligations and the Court’s Orders in the upcoming.”

Gutman told Insider she was not able to comment on this issue.